Sanctity of Life. Do those words strike a nerve? On January 22, as a nation, we acknowledged the 29th year of celebrating the Sanctity of Human Life. In 1983 former Surgeon General C. Everett Koop asked President Ronald Reagan to create a special day to focus on the intrinsic value of human life. That same year, President Reagan issued a proclamation establishing a National Sanctity of Human Life Sunday.
The idea came out of an organization, now known as Care Net, which is an international organization that provides support to the nation’s ever-growing number of life-affirming crisis pregnancy care centers. Hope Pregnancy Care Center of St. George is a member of Care Net.
In President Reagan’s speech addressing SOHLS he acknowledged that more than 15 million unborn babies have died due to legalized abortion. In the year 2007, the last reporting year available, Centers for Disease Control reported that 827,609 legal abortions were performed (cdc.gov).
SOHLS has a special meaning to me because my son, Ryan, was born at 1:47 a.m. on Sanctity of Human Life Sunday in 1990, weighing only 1090 grams (two pounds, six ounces). He fought for his life, with help from a plethora of doctors, nurses and specialists.
Ryan came home from the hospital 80 days later, just a week before his original due date, weighing only four-and-a-half pounds. Over 80 thousand babies were aborted during the time that Ryan was in the hospital.
To date there have been more than 50 million legal abortions performed since the passing of Roe V. Wade. Some would say we don’t need 50 million more people in this country anyway. But my point is, if those babies were unplanned to begin with, they should not have been conceived. There is no reason, with today’s methods of pregnancy prevention, that even one baby should be lost to abortion. I support abstinence outside of marriage. But those who don’t live by this moral conduct can go to any local store and find a myriad of contraceptives available. Though not one is one-hundred-percent effective, a combination of more than one method can prevent pregnancy.
Abortion is not just a moral issue. It’s a question of good discernment. We take precautions everyday in life to avoid negative consequences. If we don’t want a speeding ticket we don’t speed. If we don’t want to get lung cancer we don’t smoke. If we don’t want to fly through a windshield in an accident, we were a seatbelt.
Why should unplanned pregnancy be any different? Again, I am one-hundred percent in favor of abstinence outside of marriage. You might not be. And that’s okay. But can you agree with me that abortion would be totally unnecessary if precautions were taken?
I’m not addressing the moral issue of sex outside of marriage. I can’t do that in 500 words. I’m simply stating that with today’s technology there is no reason for almost a million babies to be aborted every year. Abortion always leaves one dead and at least another one wounded.
Rhonda Tommer is a resident of Santa Clara and a member of The Spectrum and Daily News Writers Group. She can be reached at r.tommer.writersgroup@gmail.com.